ACES vs ARKG
vs
ACES vs ARKG
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. ACES offers more diversification with 38 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | ARKG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Ark Invest |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.75% |
| AUM | $118M | $1.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 35 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2014-10-31 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Small Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | -1.48% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +2.60% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +22.24% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | -0.54% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | -20.24% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +7.57% |
| Buy Score | 58 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 58 |
| Value Score | 63 | 60 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or ARKG?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while ARKG charges 0.75%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and ARKG hold the same stocks?
ACES and ARKG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or ARKG?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while ARKG returned +22.24%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.