ACES vs ARKG
vs
ACES vs ARKG
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ARK Genomic Revolution ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. ACES offers more diversification with 37 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | ARKG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Ark Invest |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.75% |
| AUM | $118M | $1.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 0.00% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 35 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2014-10-31 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Small Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | -1.48% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +2.60% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +22.24% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | -0.54% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | -20.24% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +7.57% |
| Buy Score | 58 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 58 |
| Value Score | 63 | 60 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
71
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or ARKG?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while ARKG charges 0.75%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and ARKG hold the same stocks?
ACES and ARKG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 71 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or ARKG?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while ARKG returned +22.24%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.