ACES vs BBEM
vs
ACES vs BBEM
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 1130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | BBEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $118M | $752M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 5.16% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 1,130 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2023-05-10 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +7.76% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +5.40% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +43.15% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 70 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 68 |
| Value Score | 63 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or BBEM?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while BBEM charges 0.15%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and BBEM hold the same stocks?
ACES and BBEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or BBEM?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while BBEM returned +43.15%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.