ACES vs BBEM
vs
ACES vs BBEM
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 866 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | BBEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $118M | $752M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 5.16% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 1,130 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2023-05-10 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +7.76% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +5.40% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +43.15% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 70 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 68 |
| Value Score | 63 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
903
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or BBEM?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while BBEM charges 0.15%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and BBEM hold the same stocks?
ACES and BBEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 903 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or BBEM?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while BBEM returned +43.15%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.