ACES vs FMO
vs
ACES vs FMO
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES offers more diversification with 38 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | FMO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | - |
| AUM | $119M | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.63% | - |
| Holdings Count | 38 | - |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | - |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | - |
| 1-Month Return | -15.21% | - |
| YTD Return | +4.73% | - |
| 1-Year Return | +38.15% | - |
| 3-Year Return | -6.90% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -13.32% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 59 | - |
| Momentum Score | 49 | - |
| Value Score | 58 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or FMO?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do ACES and FMO hold the same stocks?
ACES and FMO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or FMO?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.