ACES vs FNGG
vs
ACES vs FNGG
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. ACES offers more diversification with 37 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | FNGG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.96% |
| AUM | $118M | $115M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 14.48% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 18 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2021-09-29 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | -6.65% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | -3.76% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +1.89% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +71.32% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 45 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 11 |
| Value Score | 63 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
50
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or FNGG?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while FNGG charges 0.96%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and FNGG hold the same stocks?
ACES and FNGG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 50 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or FNGG?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while FNGG returned +1.89%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.