ACES vs FQAL
vs
ACES vs FQAL
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | FQAL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $118M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 1.10% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 130 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2016-09-12 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +1.52% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +1.40% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +15.18% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +19.11% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | +14.01% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 74 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 49 |
| Value Score | 63 | 74 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
161
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or FQAL?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while FQAL charges 0.15%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and FQAL hold the same stocks?
ACES and FQAL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 161 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or FQAL?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while FQAL returned +15.18%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.