ACES vs FTGS
vs
ACES vs FTGS
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs First Trust Growth Strength ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTGS offers more diversification with 51 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | FTGS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $118M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 0.16% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 51 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2022-10-25 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +1.50% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +1.44% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +10.72% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +18.08% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 71 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 47 |
| Value Score | 63 | 66 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or FTGS?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while FTGS charges 0.60%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and FTGS hold the same stocks?
ACES and FTGS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or FTGS?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while FTGS returned +10.72%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.