ACES vs FTGS

vs

Quick Verdict

ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTGS offers more diversification with 50 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACESFTGS
Fund FamilyALPS AdvisorsFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
Expense Ratio0.55%0.60%
AUM$118M$1.2B
Dividend Yield0.70%0.16%
Holdings Count3851
Inception Date2018-06-272022-10-25
Investment StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
1-Month Return-8.31%+1.50%
YTD Return-3.93%+1.44%
1-Year Return+37.28%+10.72%
3-Year Return-11.44%+18.08%
5-Year Return-15.90%-
10-Year Return--
Buy Score5871
Momentum Score3347
Value Score6366

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
87
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, ACES or FTGS?

ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while FTGS charges 0.60%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do ACES and FTGS hold the same stocks?

ACES and FTGS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 87 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, ACES or FTGS?

Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while FTGS returned +10.72%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.