ACES vs GLOW
vs
ACES vs GLOW
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. ACES offers more diversification with 37 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | GLOW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Victory Capital Management Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.72% |
| AUM | $118M | $47M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 1.43% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 15 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2024-06-21 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +2.84% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +3.51% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +18.65% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 57 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 64 |
| Value Score | 63 | 45 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
51
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or GLOW?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while GLOW charges 0.72%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and GLOW hold the same stocks?
ACES and GLOW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 51 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or GLOW?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while GLOW returned +18.65%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.