ACES vs HCOM
vs
ACES vs HCOM
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. HCOM offers more diversification with 55 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | HCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Hartford Funds |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.59% |
| AUM | $118M | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 10.95% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 55 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2021-09-14 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Commodities |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | -1.05% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +4.57% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +2.31% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | -5.19% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 55 |
| Value Score | 63 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
37
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or HCOM?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while HCOM charges 0.59%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and HCOM hold the same stocks?
ACES and HCOM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 37 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or HCOM?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while HCOM returned +2.31%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.