ACES vs IG
vs
ACES vs IG
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IG has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. IG offers more diversification with 231 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | IG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Principal Funds |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.19% |
| AUM | $118M | $166M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 4.97% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 231 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2018-04-18 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Long Term Mid Quality |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +0.38% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +0.43% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +7.39% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +4.29% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | -0.34% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 70 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 35 |
| Value Score | 63 | 58 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or IG?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IG charges 0.19%. IG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and IG hold the same stocks?
ACES and IG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or IG?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while IG returned +7.39%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.