ACES vs IGBH
vs
ACES vs IGBH
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGBH offers more diversification with 274 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | IGBH |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.14% |
| AUM | $118M | $174M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 6.09% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 274 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2015-07-22 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Ultrashort Term Bond |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +0.89% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +0.85% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +7.33% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +7.78% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | +5.04% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +4.61% |
| Buy Score | 58 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 41 |
| Value Score | 63 | 63 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or IGBH?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IGBH charges 0.14%. IGBH is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and IGBH hold the same stocks?
ACES and IGBH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or IGBH?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while IGBH returned +7.33%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.