ACES vs IGBH
vs
ACES vs IGBH
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. ACES offers more diversification with 37 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | IGBH |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.14% |
| AUM | $118M | $174M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 6.09% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 274 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2015-07-22 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Ultrashort Term Bond |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +0.89% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +0.85% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +7.33% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +7.78% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | +5.04% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +4.61% |
| Buy Score | 58 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 41 |
| Value Score | 63 | 63 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
39
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or IGBH?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IGBH charges 0.14%. IGBH is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and IGBH hold the same stocks?
ACES and IGBH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 39 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or IGBH?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while IGBH returned +7.33%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.