ACES vs IZRL
vs
ACES vs IZRL
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. IZRL offers more diversification with 62 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Ark Invest |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $118M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 2.83% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 65 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2017-12-04 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +2.42% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +1.88% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +27.23% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +17.68% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | -1.17% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 53 |
| Value Score | 63 | 70 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
99
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or IZRL?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and IZRL hold the same stocks?
ACES and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 99 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or IZRL?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while IZRL returned +27.23%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.