ACES vs IZRL
vs
ACES vs IZRL
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. IZRL offers more diversification with 65 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Ark Invest |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $118M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 2.83% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 65 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2017-12-04 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +2.42% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +1.88% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +27.23% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +17.68% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | -1.17% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 53 |
| Value Score | 63 | 70 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or IZRL?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and IZRL hold the same stocks?
ACES and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or IZRL?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while IZRL returned +27.23%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.