ACES vs MFEM
vs
ACES vs MFEM
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFEM offers more diversification with 693 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $118M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 79 |
| Value Score | 63 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
730
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or MFEM?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while MFEM charges 0.49%. MFEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and MFEM hold the same stocks?
ACES and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 730 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or MFEM?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while MFEM returned +37.08%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.