ACES vs PATN
vs
ACES vs PATN
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $118M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 74 |
| Value Score | 63 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
37
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or PATN?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while PATN charges 0.65%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and PATN hold the same stocks?
ACES and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 37 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or PATN?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.