ACES vs PATN
vs
ACES vs PATN
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $118M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | - |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 74 |
| Value Score | 63 | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or PATN?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while PATN charges 0.65%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and PATN hold the same stocks?
ACES and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or PATN?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.