ACES vs PHDG
vs
ACES vs PHDG
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
PHDG has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. PHDG offers more diversification with 513 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | PHDG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| AUM | $118M | $65M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 2.06% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 513 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2012-12-05 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | All Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | +0.30% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | +1.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +3.17% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +7.51% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | +4.00% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +6.36% |
| Buy Score | 58 | 71 |
| Momentum Score | 33 | 41 |
| Value Score | 63 | 57 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or PHDG?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while PHDG charges 0.39%. PHDG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and PHDG hold the same stocks?
ACES and PHDG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or PHDG?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while PHDG returned +3.17%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.