ACES vs SCHQ
vs
ACES vs SCHQ
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHQ offers more diversification with 98 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $119M | $756M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.63% | 4.73% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 98 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | -15.21% | +1.03% |
| YTD Return | +4.73% | +0.99% |
| 1-Year Return | +38.15% | +2.87% |
| 3-Year Return | -6.90% | -0.50% |
| 5-Year Return | -13.32% | -5.65% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 59 | 66 |
| Momentum Score | 49 | 25 |
| Value Score | 58 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
37
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or SCHQ?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
ACES and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 37 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or SCHQ?
Over the past year, ACES returned +38.15% while SCHQ returned +2.87%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.