ACES vs SPGM

vs

Quick Verdict

SPGM has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2834 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACESSPGM
Fund FamilyALPS AdvisorsSPDR State Street Global Advisors
Expense Ratio0.55%0.09%
AUM$118M$1.5B
Dividend Yield0.70%1.80%
Holdings Count382,954
Inception Date2018-06-272012-02-27
Investment StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
1-Month Return-8.31%+3.34%
YTD Return-3.93%+2.71%
1-Year Return+37.28%+23.81%
3-Year Return-11.44%+19.04%
5-Year Return-15.90%+12.35%
10-Year Return-+5.47%
Buy Score5876
Momentum Score3359
Value Score6371

Holdings Overlap

1.5%
Weight Overlap
20
Shared Holdings
2851
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerACES WeightSPGM Weight
ENPH7.62%0.00%
ALB6.21%0.01%
NXT5.94%0.08%
TSLA4.11%1.28%
RUN5.32%0.01%
ORA5.19%0.01%
HASI4.95%0.01%
ITRI4.80%0.01%
FSLR4.26%0.02%
EOSE3.81%0.01%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, ACES or SPGM?

ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do ACES and SPGM hold the same stocks?

ACES and SPGM share 20 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. They hold 2851 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, ACES or SPGM?

Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while SPGM returned +23.81%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.