ACES vs TYLG
vs
ACES vs TYLG
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ACES has a lower expense ratio. ACES delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACES | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $118M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 38 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2018-06-27 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Growth | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | -8.31% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | -3.93% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +37.28% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | -11.44% | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | -15.90% | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 58 | - |
| Momentum Score | 33 | - |
| Value Score | 63 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.1%
Weight Overlap
1
Shared Holdings
107
Total Unique
Top Shared Holdings
| Ticker | ACES Weight | TYLG Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FSLR | 4.26% | 0.11% |
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ACES or TYLG?
ACES has an expense ratio of 0.55% while TYLG charges 0.60%. ACES is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ACES and TYLG hold the same stocks?
ACES and TYLG share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. They hold 107 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ACES or TYLG?
Over the past year, ACES returned +37.28% while TYLG returned +15.55%. ACES outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.