AOD vs AWF
vs
AOD vs AWF
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
AWF has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | AWF |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 1.00% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $975M |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 6.92% |
| Holdings Count | 86 | 1,273 |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | 1993-07-28 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | High Yield Bond |
| 1-Month Return | -3.16% | +0.31% |
| YTD Return | +7.32% | +2.45% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.61% | +6.85% |
| 3-Year Return | +14.09% | +9.87% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.97% | +4.43% |
| 10-Year Return | +14.37% | +8.63% |
| Buy Score | 56 | 63 |
| Momentum Score | 55 | 38 |
| Value Score | 50 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
792
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or AWF?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while AWF charges 1.00%. AWF is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AOD and AWF hold the same stocks?
AOD and AWF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 792 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or AWF?
Over the past year, AOD returned +20.61% while AWF returned +6.85%. AOD outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.