AOD vs CGW
vs
AOD vs CGW
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
CGW has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | CGW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.58% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.52% |
| Holdings Count | 86 | 82 |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | 2007-05-14 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -3.16% | +5.03% |
| YTD Return | +7.32% | +3.29% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.61% | +6.67% |
| 3-Year Return | +14.09% | +9.93% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.97% | +5.67% |
| 10-Year Return | +14.37% | +9.87% |
| Buy Score | 56 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 55 | 39 |
| Value Score | 50 | 70 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
153
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or CGW?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while CGW charges 0.58%. CGW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AOD and CGW hold the same stocks?
AOD and CGW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 153 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or CGW?
Over the past year, AOD returned +20.61% while CGW returned +6.67%. AOD outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.