AOD vs CGW
vs
AOD vs CGW
ABERDEEN TOTAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND FUND vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
AOD offers more diversification with 87 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | CGW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ABERDEEN TOTAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND FUND | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.59% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.45% |
| Holdings Count | - | 77 |
| Inception Date | - | 2007-05-14 |
| Investment Style | - | Mid Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | - | +4.39% |
| YTD Return | - | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | - | +23.15% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +12.85% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +8.95% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +11.62% |
| Buy Score | - | 81 |
| Momentum Score | - | 83 |
| Value Score | - | 52 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
87
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or CGW?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do AOD and CGW hold the same stocks?
AOD and CGW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 87 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or CGW?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.