AOD vs FMO
vs
AOD vs FMO
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FMO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | - |
| AUM | $1.0B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | - |
| Holdings Count | 86 | - |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | - |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| 1-Month Return | -3.16% | - |
| YTD Return | +7.32% | - |
| 1-Year Return | +20.61% | - |
| 3-Year Return | +14.09% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +7.97% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +14.37% | - |
| Buy Score | 56 | - |
| Momentum Score | 55 | - |
| Value Score | 50 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
85
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or FMO?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do AOD and FMO hold the same stocks?
AOD and FMO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 85 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or FMO?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.