AOD vs FNGG

vs

Quick Verdict

FNGG has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAODFNGG
Fund FamilyAberdeenDirexion Shares ETF Trust
Expense Ratio1.16%0.97%
AUM$1.0B$126M
Dividend Yield11.72%11.05%
Holdings Count8618
Inception Date2007-01-262021-09-29
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendTrading-Leveraged Equity
1-Month Return-3.16%-16.73%
YTD Return+7.32%+11.29%
1-Year Return+20.61%+14.76%
3-Year Return+14.09%+48.10%
5-Year Return+7.97%-
10-Year Return+14.37%-
Buy Score5645
Momentum Score5566
Value Score50-

Holdings Overlap

9.2%
Weight Overlap
3
Shared Holdings
94
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerAOD WeightFNGG Weight
AAPL3.11%5.35%
AVGO3.07%5.03%
MSFT3.03%4.97%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, AOD or FNGG?

AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while FNGG charges 0.97%. FNGG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do AOD and FNGG hold the same stocks?

AOD and FNGG share 3 common holdings with a 9.2% weight overlap. They hold 94 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, AOD or FNGG?

Over the past year, AOD returned +20.61% while FNGG returned +14.76%. AOD outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.