AOD vs FQAL
vs
AOD vs FQAL
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 124 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FQAL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.17% |
| Holdings Count | 86 | 129 |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | 2016-09-12 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +2.95% | +3.73% |
| YTD Return | +10.82% | +7.76% |
| 1-Year Return | +29.09% | +22.30% |
| 3-Year Return | +16.95% | +21.06% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.60% | +12.60% |
| 10-Year Return | +14.63% | - |
| Buy Score | 59 | 69 |
| Momentum Score | 66 | 54 |
| Value Score | 49 | 74 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or FQAL?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while FQAL charges 0.15%. FQAL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AOD and FQAL hold the same stocks?
AOD and FQAL share 13 common holdings with a 16.6% weight overlap. They hold 196 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or FQAL?
Over the past year, AOD returned +29.09% while FQAL returned +22.30%. AOD outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.