AOD vs MFEM
vs
AOD vs MFEM
ABERDEEN TOTAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND FUND vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
MFEM offers more diversification with 772 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | ABERDEEN TOTAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND FUND | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | - | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | - | 772 |
| Inception Date | - | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | - | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | - | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | - | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | - | 68 |
| Momentum Score | - | 79 |
| Value Score | - | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
87
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or MFEM?
Expense ratio data is not currently available.
Do AOD and MFEM hold the same stocks?
AOD and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 87 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or MFEM?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.