AOD vs NMI
vs
AOD vs NMI
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Nuveen Municipal Income Fund Inc.
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
NMI has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. NMI offers more diversification with 95 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | NMI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Nuveen |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.73% |
| AUM | $1.0B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 4.57% |
| Holdings Count | 86 | 220 |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | 1988-04-20 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Municipal Bond |
| 1-Month Return | -3.16% | +1.09% |
| YTD Return | +7.32% | +3.37% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.61% | +7.44% |
| 3-Year Return | +14.09% | +4.93% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.97% | +1.16% |
| 10-Year Return | +14.37% | +4.12% |
| Buy Score | 56 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 55 | 39 |
| Value Score | 50 | 34 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
180
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or NMI?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while NMI charges 0.73%. NMI is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AOD and NMI hold the same stocks?
AOD and NMI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 180 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or NMI?
Over the past year, AOD returned +20.61% while NMI returned +7.44%. AOD outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.