AOD vs PATN
vs
AOD vs PATN
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
PATN has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 106 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $191M |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.59% |
| Holdings Count | 86 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -3.16% | -0.48% |
| YTD Return | +7.32% | +34.18% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.61% | +61.44% |
| 3-Year Return | +14.09% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +7.97% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +14.37% | - |
| Buy Score | 56 | 79 |
| Momentum Score | 55 | 92 |
| Value Score | 50 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
85
Total Unique
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or PATN?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while PATN charges 0.65%. PATN is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AOD and PATN hold the same stocks?
AOD and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 85 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or PATN?
Over the past year, AOD returned +20.61% while PATN returned +61.44%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.