AOD vs PHDG
vs
AOD vs PHDG
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
PHDG has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. PHDG offers more diversification with 504 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | PHDG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.39% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $74M |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 1.68% |
| Holdings Count | 86 | 514 |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | 2012-12-05 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -3.16% | -3.25% |
| YTD Return | +7.32% | +10.11% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.61% | +18.03% |
| 3-Year Return | +14.09% | +9.32% |
| 5-Year Return | +7.97% | +4.65% |
| 10-Year Return | +14.37% | +7.38% |
| Buy Score | 56 | 72 |
| Momentum Score | 55 | 64 |
| Value Score | 50 | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or PHDG?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while PHDG charges 0.39%. PHDG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AOD and PHDG hold the same stocks?
AOD and PHDG share 38 common holdings with a 17.3% weight overlap. They hold 551 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or PHDG?
Over the past year, AOD returned +20.61% while PHDG returned +18.03%. AOD outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.