AOD vs TYLG
vs
AOD vs TYLG
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 7.86% |
| Holdings Count | 86 | 77 |
| Inception Date | 2007-01-26 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +2.95% | +11.78% |
| YTD Return | +10.82% | +21.78% |
| 1-Year Return | +29.09% | +48.67% |
| 3-Year Return | +16.95% | +24.73% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.60% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +14.63% | - |
| Buy Score | 59 | 71 |
| Momentum Score | 66 | 81 |
| Value Score | 49 | 48 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AOD or TYLG?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while TYLG charges 0.60%. TYLG is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AOD and TYLG hold the same stocks?
AOD and TYLG share 7 common holdings with a 12.4% weight overlap. They hold 152 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AOD or TYLG?
Over the past year, AOD returned +29.09% while TYLG returned +48.67%. TYLG outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.