ARKG vs CGW
vs
ARKG vs CGW
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
CGW has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 77 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | CGW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| AUM | $1.3B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.45% |
| Holdings Count | 35 | 77 |
| Inception Date | 2014-10-31 | 2007-05-14 |
| Investment Style | Small Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | -1.48% | +4.39% |
| YTD Return | +2.60% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +22.24% | +23.15% |
| 3-Year Return | -0.54% | +12.85% |
| 5-Year Return | -20.24% | +8.95% |
| 10-Year Return | +7.57% | +11.62% |
| Buy Score | 68 | 81 |
| Momentum Score | 58 | 83 |
| Value Score | 60 | 52 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, ARKG or CGW?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while CGW charges 0.59%. CGW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do ARKG and CGW hold the same stocks?
ARKG and CGW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, ARKG or CGW?
Over the past year, ARKG returned +22.24% while CGW returned +23.15%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.