AWF vs BBEM
vs
AWF vs BBEM
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 888 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | BBEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $975M | $801M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 2.52% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 1,132 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2023-05-10 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +0.31% | +0.54% |
| YTD Return | +2.45% | +22.43% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.85% | +46.91% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.87% | +23.10% |
| 5-Year Return | +4.43% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +8.63% | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 82 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 83 |
| Value Score | 53 | 58 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
1595
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or BBEM?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while BBEM charges 0.15%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and BBEM hold the same stocks?
AWF and BBEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 1595 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or BBEM?
Over the past year, AWF returned +6.85% while BBEM returned +46.91%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.