AWF vs FLGV
vs
AWF vs FLGV
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. AWF delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 706 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | FLGV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.09% |
| AUM | $974M | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 4.13% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 47 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2020-06-09 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Intermediate Term US Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +0.75% | +0.08% |
| YTD Return | +2.13% | +0.28% |
| 1-Year Return | +8.28% | +3.86% |
| 3-Year Return | +10.49% | +2.88% |
| 5-Year Return | +4.67% | -0.09% |
| 10-Year Return | +8.87% | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 71 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 22 |
| Value Score | 54 | 61 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
706
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or FLGV?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while FLGV charges 0.09%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and FLGV hold the same stocks?
AWF and FLGV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 706 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or FLGV?
Over the past year, AWF returned +8.28% while FLGV returned +3.86%. AWF outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.