AWF vs FMN
vs
AWF vs FMN
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FMN has a lower expense ratio. FMN delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 706 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | FMN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Federated Hermes |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.75% |
| AUM | $974M | $16M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 4.29% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 150 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2002-12-20 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Municipal Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +0.75% | +0.32% |
| YTD Return | +2.13% | +1.54% |
| 1-Year Return | +8.28% | +9.39% |
| 3-Year Return | +10.49% | +4.29% |
| 5-Year Return | +4.67% | -0.88% |
| 10-Year Return | +8.87% | +4.02% |
| Buy Score | 63 | 56 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 33 |
| Value Score | 54 | 39 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
791
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or FMN?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while FMN charges 0.75%. FMN is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and FMN hold the same stocks?
AWF and FMN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 791 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or FMN?
Over the past year, AWF returned +8.28% while FMN returned +9.39%. FMN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.