AWF vs FTGS
vs
AWF vs FTGS
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs First Trust Growth Strength ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FTGS has a lower expense ratio. FTGS delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | FTGS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $975M | $1.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 0.08% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 51 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2022-10-25 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +0.31% | -1.12% |
| YTD Return | +2.45% | +4.73% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.85% | +8.32% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.87% | +16.75% |
| 5-Year Return | +4.43% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +8.63% | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 67 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 44 |
| Value Score | 53 | 72 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
757
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or FTGS?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while FTGS charges 0.60%. FTGS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and FTGS hold the same stocks?
AWF and FTGS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 757 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or FTGS?
Over the past year, AWF returned +6.85% while FTGS returned +8.32%. FTGS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.