AWF vs GTOS

vs

Quick Verdict

GTOS has a lower expense ratio. AWF delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAWFGTOS
Fund FamilyAllianceBernstein L.P.Invesco (US)
Expense Ratio1.00%0.30%
AUM$975M$122M
Dividend Yield6.92%4.55%
Holdings Count1,2731,047
Inception Date1993-07-282022-12-09
Investment StyleHigh Yield BondShort Term High Yield Bond
1-Month Return+0.31%-0.23%
YTD Return+2.45%+0.92%
1-Year Return+6.85%+4.04%
3-Year Return+9.87%+6.12%
5-Year Return+4.43%-
10-Year Return+8.63%-
Buy Score6359
Momentum Score3827
Value Score53-

Holdings Overlap

0.6%
Weight Overlap
14
Shared Holdings
987
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerAWF WeightGTOS Weight
MEDIND 3.875 04/01/20.03%0.85%
GAP 3.625 10/01/29 10.03%0.33%
GPI 4 08/15/28 144A0.16%0.18%
MPEL 5.625 07/17/27 0.10%0.22%
AL V4.65 PERP B0.12%0.18%
CVS V7 03/10/550.23%0.02%
RBC 4.375 10/15/29 10.01%0.17%
CRWV 9.25 06/01/30 10.03%0.11%
SEE 6.125 02/01/28 10.06%0.01%
OHI 5.2 07/01/300.06%0.01%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, AWF or GTOS?

AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while GTOS charges 0.30%. GTOS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do AWF and GTOS hold the same stocks?

AWF and GTOS share 14 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. They hold 987 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, AWF or GTOS?

Over the past year, AWF returned +6.85% while GTOS returned +4.04%. AWF outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.