AWF vs HCOM
vs
AWF vs HCOM
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
HCOM has a lower expense ratio. AWF delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | HCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Hartford Funds |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.59% |
| AUM | $975M | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 10.95% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 55 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2021-09-14 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Commodities |
| 1-Month Return | +0.31% | -1.05% |
| YTD Return | +2.45% | +4.57% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.85% | +2.31% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.87% | -5.19% |
| 5-Year Return | +4.43% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +8.63% | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 60 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 36 |
| Value Score | 53 | 57 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
707
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or HCOM?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while HCOM charges 0.59%. HCOM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and HCOM hold the same stocks?
AWF and HCOM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 707 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or HCOM?
Over the past year, AWF returned +6.85% while HCOM returned +2.31%. AWF outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.