AWF vs IZRL
vs
AWF vs IZRL
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. IZRL delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | IZRL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Ark Invest |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $975M | $152M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 2.55% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 63 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2017-12-04 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +0.31% | -6.80% |
| YTD Return | +2.45% | +1.94% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.85% | +15.44% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.87% | +18.48% |
| 5-Year Return | +4.43% | -0.35% |
| 10-Year Return | +8.63% | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 53 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 37 |
| Value Score | 53 | 75 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
707
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or IZRL?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and IZRL hold the same stocks?
AWF and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 707 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or IZRL?
Over the past year, AWF returned +6.85% while IZRL returned +15.44%. IZRL outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.