AWF vs PATN
vs
AWF vs PATN
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
PATN has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $975M | $191M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 1.59% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +0.31% | -0.48% |
| YTD Return | +2.45% | +34.18% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.85% | +61.44% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.87% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +4.43% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +8.63% | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 79 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 92 |
| Value Score | 53 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
808
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or PATN?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while PATN charges 0.65%. PATN is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and PATN hold the same stocks?
AWF and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 808 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or PATN?
Over the past year, AWF returned +6.85% while PATN returned +61.44%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.