AWF vs SAWS
vs
AWF vs SAWS
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | SAWS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.55% |
| AUM | $975M | $8M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 0.02% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 72 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2024-07-30 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Small Cap Growth |
| 1-Month Return | +0.31% | +11.92% |
| YTD Return | +2.45% | +22.88% |
| 1-Year Return | +6.85% | +32.24% |
| 3-Year Return | +9.87% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +4.43% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +8.63% | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 70 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 89 |
| Value Score | 53 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
778
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or SAWS?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and SAWS hold the same stocks?
AWF and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 778 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or SAWS?
Over the past year, AWF returned +6.85% while SAWS returned +32.24%. SAWS outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.