AWF vs TLTP
vs
AWF vs TLTP
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund vs Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
TLTP has a lower expense ratio. AWF delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 706 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AWF | TLTP |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Amplify ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.39% |
| AUM | $974M | $22M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 14.33% |
| Holdings Count | 1,273 | 5 |
| Inception Date | 1993-07-28 | 2024-10-29 |
| Investment Style | High Yield Bond | Multi Alternative |
| 1-Month Return | +0.75% | +0.31% |
| YTD Return | +2.13% | +1.48% |
| 1-Year Return | +8.28% | +7.00% |
| 3-Year Return | +10.49% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +4.67% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +8.87% | - |
| Buy Score | 63 | 50 |
| Momentum Score | 38 | 31 |
| Value Score | 54 | - |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
709
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, AWF or TLTP?
AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while TLTP charges 0.39%. TLTP is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do AWF and TLTP hold the same stocks?
AWF and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 709 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, AWF or TLTP?
Over the past year, AWF returned +8.28% while TLTP returned +7.00%. AWF outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.