AWF vs VGI

vs

Quick Verdict

AWF has a lower expense ratio. VGI delivered stronger 1-year returns. AWF offers more diversification with 707 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAWFVGI
Fund FamilyAllianceBernstein L.P.Virtus Investment Partners
Expense Ratio1.00%1.74%
AUM$975M$90M
Dividend Yield6.92%11.98%
Holdings Count1,273646
Inception Date1993-07-282012-02-23
Investment StyleHigh Yield BondDiversified Sectoral Bond
1-Month Return+0.31%+0.37%
YTD Return+2.45%+3.00%
1-Year Return+6.85%+9.83%
3-Year Return+9.87%+9.14%
5-Year Return+4.43%+2.26%
10-Year Return+8.63%+3.48%
Buy Score6358
Momentum Score3841
Value Score5333

Holdings Overlap

2.9%
Weight Overlap
44
Shared Holdings
1097
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, AWF or VGI?

AWF has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VGI charges 1.74%. AWF is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do AWF and VGI hold the same stocks?

AWF and VGI share 44 common holdings with a 2.9% weight overlap. They hold 1097 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, AWF or VGI?

Over the past year, AWF returned +6.85% while VGI returned +9.83%. VGI outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.