BBEM vs CGW
vs
BBEM vs CGW
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 889 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | CGW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.58% |
| AUM | $785M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.64% | 1.52% |
| Holdings Count | 1,132 | 82 |
| Inception Date | 2023-05-10 | 2007-05-14 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +7.84% | -3.82% |
| YTD Return | +21.77% | -1.65% |
| 1-Year Return | +55.37% | +4.08% |
| 3-Year Return | +24.49% | +10.37% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +4.62% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +9.48% |
| Buy Score | 81 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 78 | 15 |
| Value Score | 59 | 72 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
889
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, BBEM or CGW?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while CGW charges 0.58%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do BBEM and CGW hold the same stocks?
BBEM and CGW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 889 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, BBEM or CGW?
Over the past year, BBEM returned +55.37% while CGW returned +4.08%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.