BBEM vs CGW
vs
BBEM vs CGW
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 1130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | CGW |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.59% |
| AUM | $752M | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.16% | 1.45% |
| Holdings Count | 1,130 | 77 |
| Inception Date | 2023-05-10 | 2007-05-14 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +7.76% | +4.39% |
| YTD Return | +5.40% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +43.15% | +23.15% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +12.85% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +8.95% |
| 10-Year Return | - | +11.62% |
| Buy Score | 70 | 81 |
| Momentum Score | 68 | 83 |
| Value Score | - | 52 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, BBEM or CGW?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while CGW charges 0.59%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do BBEM and CGW hold the same stocks?
BBEM and CGW share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, BBEM or CGW?
Over the past year, BBEM returned +43.15% while CGW returned +23.15%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.