BBEM vs FNGG

vs

Quick Verdict

BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 888 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBEMFNGG
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementDirexion Shares ETF Trust
Expense Ratio0.15%0.97%
AUM$801M$126M
Dividend Yield2.52%11.05%
Holdings Count1,13218
Inception Date2023-05-102021-09-29
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendTrading-Leveraged Equity
1-Month Return+0.54%-16.73%
YTD Return+22.43%+11.29%
1-Year Return+46.91%+14.76%
3-Year Return+23.10%+48.10%
5-Year Return--
10-Year Return--
Buy Score8245
Momentum Score8366
Value Score58-

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
900
Total Unique

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, BBEM or FNGG?

BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FNGG charges 0.97%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do BBEM and FNGG hold the same stocks?

BBEM and FNGG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 900 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, BBEM or FNGG?

Over the past year, BBEM returned +46.91% while FNGG returned +14.76%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.