BBEM vs FNGG

vs

Quick Verdict

BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 1130 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBEMFNGG
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementDirexion Shares ETF Trust
Expense Ratio0.15%0.96%
AUM$752M$115M
Dividend Yield5.16%14.48%
Holdings Count1,13018
Inception Date2023-05-102021-09-29
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendTrading-Leveraged Equity
1-Month Return+7.76%-6.65%
YTD Return+5.40%-3.76%
1-Year Return+43.15%+1.89%
3-Year Return-+71.32%
5-Year Return--
10-Year Return--
Buy Score7045
Momentum Score689
Value Score-68

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, BBEM or FNGG?

BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FNGG charges 0.96%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do BBEM and FNGG hold the same stocks?

BBEM and FNGG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, BBEM or FNGG?

Over the past year, BBEM returned +43.15% while FNGG returned +1.89%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.