BBEM vs FQAL
vs
BBEM vs FQAL
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 1130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | FQAL |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| AUM | $752M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.16% | 1.10% |
| Holdings Count | 1,130 | 130 |
| Inception Date | 2023-05-10 | 2016-09-12 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +7.76% | +1.52% |
| YTD Return | +5.40% | +1.40% |
| 1-Year Return | +43.15% | +15.18% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +19.11% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +14.01% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 70 | 74 |
| Momentum Score | 68 | 49 |
| Value Score | - | 74 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, BBEM or FQAL?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FQAL charges 0.15%. They charge the same expense ratio.
Do BBEM and FQAL hold the same stocks?
BBEM and FQAL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, BBEM or FQAL?
Over the past year, BBEM returned +43.15% while FQAL returned +15.18%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.