BBEM vs FTGS

vs

Quick Verdict

BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 866 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBEMFTGS
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
Expense Ratio0.15%0.60%
AUM$752M$1.2B
Dividend Yield5.16%0.16%
Holdings Count1,13051
Inception Date2023-05-102022-10-25
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
1-Month Return+7.76%+1.50%
YTD Return+5.40%+1.44%
1-Year Return+43.15%+10.72%
3-Year Return-+18.08%
5-Year Return--
10-Year Return--
Buy Score7071
Momentum Score6847
Value Score-66

Holdings Overlap

0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
916
Total Unique

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, BBEM or FTGS?

BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while FTGS charges 0.60%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do BBEM and FTGS hold the same stocks?

BBEM and FTGS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 916 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, BBEM or FTGS?

Over the past year, BBEM returned +43.15% while FTGS returned +10.72%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.