BBEM vs MFEM
vs
BBEM vs MFEM
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 1130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $752M | $127M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.16% | 2.32% |
| Holdings Count | 1,130 | 772 |
| Inception Date | 2023-05-10 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +7.76% | +9.42% |
| YTD Return | +5.40% | +7.98% |
| 1-Year Return | +43.15% | +37.08% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +15.74% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +7.46% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 70 | 68 |
| Momentum Score | 68 | 79 |
| Value Score | - | 53 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, BBEM or MFEM?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while MFEM charges 0.49%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do BBEM and MFEM hold the same stocks?
BBEM and MFEM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, BBEM or MFEM?
Over the past year, BBEM returned +43.15% while MFEM returned +37.08%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.