BBEM vs MFEM
vs
BBEM vs MFEM
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 888 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | PIMCO (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $801M | $145M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 2.14% |
| Holdings Count | 1,132 | 730 |
| Inception Date | 2023-05-10 | 2017-08-31 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| 1-Month Return | +0.54% | -5.75% |
| YTD Return | +22.43% | +20.38% |
| 1-Year Return | +46.91% | +36.47% |
| 3-Year Return | +23.10% | +20.04% |
| 5-Year Return | - | +7.58% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 82 | 81 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 84 |
| Value Score | 58 | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, BBEM or MFEM?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while MFEM charges 0.49%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do BBEM and MFEM hold the same stocks?
BBEM and MFEM share 310 common holdings with a 31.3% weight overlap. They hold 1277 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, BBEM or MFEM?
Over the past year, BBEM returned +46.91% while MFEM returned +36.47%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.