BBEM vs PATN
vs
BBEM vs PATN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
BBEM has a lower expense ratio. PATN delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 866 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Pacer ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.65% |
| AUM | $752M | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.16% | 1.89% |
| Holdings Count | 1,130 | 106 |
| Inception Date | 2023-05-10 | 2024-09-16 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +7.76% | +9.09% |
| YTD Return | +5.40% | +7.70% |
| 1-Year Return | +43.15% | +46.33% |
| 3-Year Return | - | - |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 70 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 68 | 72 |
| Value Score | - | 50 |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, BBEM or PATN?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while PATN charges 0.65%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do BBEM and PATN hold the same stocks?
BBEM and PATN share 16 common holdings with a 12.6% weight overlap. They hold 951 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, BBEM or PATN?
Over the past year, BBEM returned +43.15% while PATN returned +46.33%. PATN outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.