BBEM vs SCHQ
vs
BBEM vs SCHQ
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
SCHQ has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 866 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | SCHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $752M | $923M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.16% | 4.43% |
| Holdings Count | 1,130 | 97 |
| Inception Date | 2023-05-10 | 2019-10-10 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Blend | Long Term Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +7.76% | -0.06% |
| YTD Return | +5.40% | +0.09% |
| 1-Year Return | +43.15% | +4.22% |
| 3-Year Return | - | -1.99% |
| 5-Year Return | - | -6.92% |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 70 | 61 |
| Momentum Score | 68 | 25 |
| Value Score | - | 73 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
876
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, BBEM or SCHQ?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SCHQ charges 0.03%. SCHQ is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do BBEM and SCHQ hold the same stocks?
BBEM and SCHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 876 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, BBEM or SCHQ?
Over the past year, BBEM returned +43.15% while SCHQ returned +4.22%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.