BBEM vs TYLG

vs

Quick Verdict

BBEM has a lower expense ratio. BBEM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBEM offers more diversification with 888 holdings.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBEMTYLG
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementGlobal X by mirae Asset
Expense Ratio0.15%0.60%
AUM$801M$15M
Dividend Yield2.52%7.86%
Holdings Count1,13277
Inception Date2023-05-102022-11-21
Investment StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
1-Month Return+0.54%+0.28%
YTD Return+22.43%+22.13%
1-Year Return+46.91%+38.91%
3-Year Return+23.10%+23.14%
5-Year Return--
10-Year Return--
Buy Score8281
Momentum Score8386
Value Score5848

Holdings Overlap

0.2%
Weight Overlap
1
Shared Holdings
961
Total Unique

Top Shared Holdings

TickerBBEM WeightTYLG Weight
2345:TW0.23%0.37%

Sector Allocation

Loading chart...

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has lower fees, BBEM or TYLG?

BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while TYLG charges 0.60%. BBEM is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.

Do BBEM and TYLG hold the same stocks?

BBEM and TYLG share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. They hold 961 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Which performed better, BBEM or TYLG?

Over the past year, BBEM returned +46.91% while TYLG returned +38.91%. BBEM outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.