CGW vs ELCV
vs
CGW vs ELCV
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Eventide High Dividend ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ELCV has a lower expense ratio. CGW offers more diversification with 77 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | ELCV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Eventide |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $167M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 2.08% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 47 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2024-09-30 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +5.84% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +4.34% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | - |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 65 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 73 |
| Value Score | 52 | 46 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or ELCV?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while ELCV charges 0.49%. ELCV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and ELCV hold the same stocks?
CGW and ELCV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or ELCV?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.