CGW vs ELCV
vs
CGW vs ELCV
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Eventide High Dividend ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
ELCV has a lower expense ratio. CGW offers more diversification with 60 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | ELCV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Eventide |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $167M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 2.08% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 47 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2024-09-30 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +5.84% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +4.34% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | - |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | - |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | - |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 65 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 73 |
| Value Score | 52 | 46 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
105
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or ELCV?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while ELCV charges 0.49%. ELCV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and ELCV hold the same stocks?
CGW and ELCV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 105 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or ELCV?
Historical return data is not currently available for comparison.