CGW vs FAAR
vs
CGW vs FAAR
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
CGW has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 60 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | FAAR |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.97% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $165M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 10.44% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 30 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2016-05-18 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Commodities |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +3.07% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +11.28% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +19.40% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +6.43% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | +7.18% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 65 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 86 |
| Value Score | 52 | 55 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
64
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or FAAR?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while FAAR charges 0.97%. CGW is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and FAAR hold the same stocks?
CGW and FAAR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 64 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or FAAR?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while FAAR returned +19.40%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.