CGW vs FLGV
vs
CGW vs FLGV
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. CGW delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGW offers more diversification with 77 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGW | FLGV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.09% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.45% | 3.99% |
| Holdings Count | 77 | 48 |
| Inception Date | 2007-05-14 | 2020-06-09 |
| Investment Style | Mid Cap Blend | Intermediate Term US Government Bond |
| 1-Month Return | +4.39% | +0.10% |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +0.15% |
| 1-Year Return | +23.15% | +5.85% |
| 3-Year Return | +12.85% | +2.58% |
| 5-Year Return | +8.95% | -0.76% |
| 10-Year Return | +11.62% | - |
| Buy Score | 81 | 71 |
| Momentum Score | 83 | 28 |
| Value Score | 52 | 67 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, CGW or FLGV?
CGW has an expense ratio of 0.59% while FLGV charges 0.09%. FLGV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do CGW and FLGV hold the same stocks?
CGW and FLGV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, CGW or FLGV?
Over the past year, CGW returned +23.15% while FLGV returned +5.85%. CGW outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.